Caitlin M. Grindey v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 15, 20212:20-cv-10250California4,068 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 ) CAITLIN G. ) Case No. CV 20-10250-JEM Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ) REVERSING DECISION OF THE 14 ANDREW M. SAUL, ) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) )

PROCEEDINGS

18 On November 9, 2020, Ms. Caitlin G.1 (“Plaintiff” or “Claimant”) filed a complaint seeking 19 review of the decision by the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying 20 Plaintiff’s applications for Social Security Disability Insurance benefits and Supplemental 21 Security Income benefits. (Dkt. 1.) The Commissioner filed an Answer on April 6, 2021. (Dkt. 22 17.) On June 8, 2021, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation (“JS”). (Dkt. 19.) The matter is now 23 ready for decision. 24 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), both parties consented to proceed before this 25 Magistrate Judge. After…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.