Orange County Water District v. 3M Company
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 19, 20218:21-cv-01029California2,431 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
July 19, 2021 Case No. 8:21-cv-01029-SVW-AS Date
Orange County Water District et al v. 3M Company et al Title
Present: The Honorable STEPHEN V. WILSON, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Paul M. Cruz N/A
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:
N/A N/A
Proceedings: ORDER GRANTING [39] MOTION TO REMAND.
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to remand. Dkt. 39. The Court finds that the motion is suitable for disposition without oral argument. See L.R. 7-15. For the below reasons, the motion is
GRANTED.
I. Removal Was Not Ascertainable from Either of Plaintiffs’ Complaints.
Plaintiffs argue that removal was ascertainable from Plaintiffs’ initial and amended complaints because, although the complaints do not specifically mention military installations as a source of groundwater contamination, they nevertheless “encompass PFOA and PFOS contamination resulting from the use of any of 3M’s products containing PFOA or PFOS in Orange County.” Mot. at 8. Plaintiffs…