Theresa Dickinson v. Comerica Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 19, 20215:21-cv-00566California1,427 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

J S -6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THERESA DICKINSON, individually Case No. 5:21-cv-00566-JWH-SPx and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

Plaintiff, MOTION TO REMAND TO STATE COURT [ECF No. 12] v.

COMERICA BANK; and DOES 1 through 20, 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Before the Court is the motion of Plaintiff Theresa Dickinson to remand this action to state court. The Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without a hearing. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; L.R. 7-15. After considering the papers filed in support and in opposition,2 the Court orders that the Motion is GRANTED, for the reasons set forth herein. I. BACKGROUND Dickson, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, commenced this action on December 28, 2020, in San Bernardino County Superior Court. In her Complaint, Dickinson asserts the following two claims for relief: (1) Breach of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.