Michael Fenske v. Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL FENSKE, individually and Case No. 5:21-cv-00811-JWH-SPx on behalf of all others similarly situated,
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S
Plaintiff, MOTION TO REMAND [ECF No. 14] v.
FRESENIUS USA MANUFACTURING, INC.; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,
Defendants.
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is the motion to remand of Plaintiff Michael Fenske.1 The Court conducted a hearing on the Motion on June 25, 2021. For the reasons explained below, the Court GRANTS the Motion. II. BACKGROUND Fenske filed this putative class action in San Bernardino Superior Court on February 9, 2021. In his Complaint, Fenske alleges that he was employed by Defendant Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc.,3 which is “in the kidney dialysis centers and medical supply industry.” Fenske individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated,…