Shahram Saba v. Maria Sinutko
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
JS-
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 || SHAHRAM SABA, Case No. CV 21-05898-PA (RAOx) Plaintiff,
ORDER REMANDING ACTION
V. AND DENYING APPLICATION TO
PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT
|| MARIA SINUTKO, et al., WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR
COSTS
Defendants. 16 17 1. FACTUAL BACKGROUND In May 2021, Plaintiff Shahram Saba filed an unlawful detainer action in Los || Angeles County Superior Court against Defendants Maria Sinutko and DOES 1-10. 47 || See Dkt. No. 1 (“Notice of Removal”) at 9-1 1.! Defendants are allegedly occupants of real property owned by Plaintiff and located in Van Nuys, California. Notice of Removal at 10. Plaintiff asserts that Defendants have failed to comply after being served a notice to quit and deliver up possession of the property and seeks costs and 2% damages. /d. at 10-11. 27 For clarity, the Court refers to the page numbers…