Justino Montiel v. Hitachi America, Ltd
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
I. BACKGROUND
On December 20, 2020, Plaintiff commenced this action against Defendants in San Bernardino County Superior Court. (Notice of Removal (“NoR”), Ex. A (“Complaint”) (Docket No. 1-1)). The Complaint alleges that, on approximately January 7, 2019, Plaintiff was at work using a nail gun labeled with Hitachi Model # NR 83A (the “Nail Gun”) when the Nail Gun misfired and lodged into his brain. (Complaint ¶¶ 14-15). Based on these allegations, Plaintiff asserts the following claims against KHA and Hitachi Solutions America, Ltd., Hitachi High Tech Science America, Inc., and Hitachi America, Ltd. (“Hitachi Defendants”): (1) strict products liability; (2) negligent failure to recall/retrofit relating; and (3) intentional failure to recall/retrofit. (See generally Complaint). Defendants filed the NoR on May 14, 2021, seeking to establish diversity jurisdiction and alleging that the Hitachi Defendants — the only California Defendants — were fraudulently joined in the action. (NoR ¶¶ 8-23). Specifically, KHA argues that the Hitachi Defendants were fraudulently joined because they do not “import, design, manufacture, market, sell, package, research, develop, produce,…