Susan Nash v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 22, 20215:20-cv-01081California3,864 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 SUSAN N., Case No. EDCV 20-1081-RAO 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KILOLO KIJAKAZI,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant. 17 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Susan N.1 (“Plaintiff”) challenges the Commissioner’s denial of her application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II. For the reasons stated below, the decision of the Commissioner is reversed and the matter is remanded for an award of benefits. /// ///

1 Plaintiff’s name is partially redacted in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. II. SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS On February 3, 2012, Plaintiff applied for DIB alleging disability beginning February 5, 2011, due to idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis (“IHSS”), “pacemaker,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.