John H. Thaler v. Brittany Rae Thaler

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 30, 20212:21-cv-02892California381 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN H. THALER, CV 21-2892 DSF (ASx) Plaintiff, Order to Show Cause Why Case v. Should not be Dismissed or Transferred to District of BRITTANY RAE THALER, et al., Arizona for Lack of Venue Defendants.

Plaintiff John H. Thaler has filed this suit against 23 defendants. No defendant a resident of California and many are officials or entities of Arizona state and local government. Three defendants have moved for dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction. Plaintiff has moved for leave to amend his complaint. A review of the complaint and the proposed amended complaint shows that there is virtually no connection between Plaintiff’s claims and this district, let alone that a “substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim” occurred in this district. The only allegations related to this district – other than vague statements to the effect that similar things were occurring in California as were happening in Arizona – are related to alleged acts that happened around 2014 and are not the basis for any of Plaintiff’s claims. This type of background allegations cannot confer…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.