Angelica R. Untalan v. Warren A. Stanley
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
O
2 3 4 5 6
United States District Court Central District of California
11 ANGELICA R. UNTALAN, Case № 2:19-cv-07599-ODW (JEMx)
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’
AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR
14 WARREN A. STANLEY, et al., PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Defendants. [94] [97]
16 I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court are the parties’ Motions for Partial Summary Judgment on 19 Plaintiff Angelica Untalan’s claims arising under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and California 20 Civil Code section 52.1. (Defs. Mot. Partial Summ. J. (“DMot.”), ECF No. 94; Pl. 21 Mot. Partial Summ. J. (“PMot.”), ECF No. 97.) For the reasons below, the Court 22 GRANTS in part and DENIES in part both Motions.1 II. BACKGROUND On May 12, 2019, Angelica Untalan was driving her Pontiac Grand Am (the 25 “Vehicle”) in Los Angeles County when she was stopped by Officer Paola Trinidad of 26 the California Highway Patrol (“CHP”). (Defs. Statement of Genuine Issues ISO