Robert Rand v. Michael Carvajal

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20212:21-cv-00720California583 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 ROBERT RAND, Case No. 2:21-cv-00720-AB (AFM)

Petitioner,

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS

v. AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF MICHAEL CARVAJAL, et. al, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE

Respondents. 16 Pursuant to U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) issued on May 21, 2021. On June 16, 2021, Petitioner filed a document entitled “Motion to Withdraw,” which the Court construes as objections to the Report. (ECF 17.) The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made and concludes that Petitioner’s objections lack merit. Initially, Petitioner indicates that he did not intend his claim to be construed as a request for compassionate release. Rather, he intends to present his motion for compassionate release to the sentencing court and requests that the Court dismiss the portion of his petition raising such a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.