Jeremy Holland v. Rosa C. Guardado

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 6, 20212:21-cv-03893California519 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JS-

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. CV 21-3893-MWF (MAAx) Date: August 6, 2021 Title: Jeremy Holland v. Rosa C. Guardado, et al. Present: The Honorable MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, U.S. District Judge

Deputy Clerk: Court Reporter: Rita Sanchez Not Reported

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant: None Present None Present

Proceedings (In Chambers): ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

On May 7, 2021, Plaintiff Jeremy Holland commenced this action against Defendant Rosa C. Guardado. (Complaint (Docket No. 1)). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), Plaintiff must have served the Complaint by August 5, 2021. On July 26, 2021, the Court issued an Order directing Plaintiff to show cause (“OSC”), by no later than August 5, 2021, why the action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (Docket No. 12). The Court indicated that if Plaintiff filed a Proof of Service reflecting that Defendant’s time to respond to the Complaint or file an Application for Stay and Early Mediation (an “ADA Application”) had already expired,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.