Richard J. Glair v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 9, 20212:13-cv-08946California2,831 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD J. GLAIR, ) NO. CV 13-8946-DDP (AGR) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND v. ) RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED ) STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AS TO CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al. ) (1) REPORT DATED DECEMBER 4, ) 2019; AND (2) REPORT DATED MAY Defendants. ) 31, 2019 ) 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the complaint, records on file, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated December 4, 2019 (“Report”) and the Objections. Further, the Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has objected. I. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkt. Nos. 193-194) The Court accepts the Report’s findings and recommendations. Defendants moved for partial summary judgment only on Federal Claims 6, 9 and 10. A. Claim 6 (Failure to Train) Plaintiff contends that the City…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.