Daniel Velasco v. Carlos Maldonado

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL VELASCO, CASE NO. 2:21-cv-04933 DSF (KSx) [Assigned to Judge Dale S. Fischer, USDC-1st Cthse Ctrm. 7D] Plaintiff, [Assigned to Mag. Karen Stevenson, USDC-Roybal, Ctrm 580]

vs.

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

OFFICER CARLOS MALDONADO;

OFFICER SCOTT OHANA; CITY

OF LOS ANGELES, BY AND

THROUGH THE LOS ANGELES

POLICE DEPARTMENT; DOES 1-25, inclusive, 17 Defendants.

19 Pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and based 21 on the parties’ Stipulated Protective Order (“Stipulation”) filed on August 6, 22 2021, the terms of the protective order to which the parties have agreed are 23 adopted as a protective order of this Court (which generally shall govern the 24 pretrial phase of this action) except to the extent, as set forth below, that those 25 terms have been modified by the Court’s amendment of the good cause 26 statement and paragraph 7.2(i) of the Stipulation. 27 \\ 1. A. PURPOSES & LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely…