Darnell Black Sr. v. Ralph Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 12, 20212:21-cv-06401California2,274 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No.: CV 21-06401-RGK (RAO) Date: August 12, 2021 Title: Black v. Diaz et al.

Present: The Honorable ROZELLA A. OLIVER, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Donnamarie Luengo N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorneys Present for Defendant(s):

N/A N/A

Proceedings: (In Chambers) ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE

TO AMEND

On October 5, 2020, Plaintiff Darnell Black, Sr. (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the Eastern District of California. Compl., Dkt. No. 1. Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis was previously granted. Dkt. No. 8. Plaintiff subsequently requested leave to amend his complaint. Dkt. Nos. 6, 7. On April 8, 2021, Magistrate Judge Cota denied Plaintiff’s motions for leave to amend as unnecessary because Plaintiff could amend as of right. Dkt. No. 20. Judge Cota provided that if no amended complaint were filed within 30 days, the action would proceed on Plaintiff’s original complaint. See id. To date, no amended complaint has been filed. On August 9, 2021, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.