Karen Milton v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 12, 20215:21-cv-00273California1,513 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

On August 3, 2020, Plaintiff filed a Complaint in the Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino. (“Complaint,” Dkt. No. 1-1.) The Complaint alleges two causes of action: (1) negligence and (2) premises liability. (See Complaint.) On November 12, 2020, Defendant filed its Answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint in state court. (Dkt. No. 8.) Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation (“Costco”) removed on February 17, 2021. (“Notice of Removal,” Dkt. No. 1.)

On June 22, 2021, Plaintiff filed this Motion. (See Motion.) In support of the Motion, Plaintiff filed the Declaration of attorney Fernando D. Vargas. (“Vargas Declaration,” Dkt. No. 17-2.) Defendant opposed on July 2, 2021. (“Opposition,” Dkt. No. 18.) Plaintiff replied on July 9, 2021. (“Reply,” Dkt. No. 19.)

II. LEGAL STANDARD

Rule 15 provides that leave to amend “shall be freely given when justice so requires.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). The Ninth Circuit has held that “[t]his policy is to be applied with extreme liberality.” Eminence Capital, L.L.C. v. Aspeon, Inc., 316 F.3d 1048, 1051 (9th Cir. 2003) (quoting Owens v. Kaiser Found. Health Plan, Inc., 244 F.3d 708, 712 (9th Cir. 2001)). Leave to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.