Andrew S. Kindle v. L.A.P.D Newton Division

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 13, 20212:21-cv-06252California3,500 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 ANDREW S. KINDLE, Case No. 2:21-cv-06252-RGK-SHK

Plaintiff, v. ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT L.A.P.D. NEWTON DIVISION, WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

15 Defendant.

16 On August 3, 2021, Plaintiff Andrew Kindle (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”), filed a complaint (“Complaint” or “Compl.”) against L.A.P.D. Newton Division (“LAPD” or “Defendant”) alleging violations of Plaintiff’s Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Electronic Case Filing Number (“ECF No.”) 1, Compl. For the reasons discussed below, the Court DISMISSES the Complaint, without prejudice, and GRANTS Plaintiff leave to amend in accordance with the instructions in Section IV of this Order. / / / / / / / / / I. BACKGROUND A. Procedural History On August 3, 2021, Plaintiff filed his Complaint against Defendant alleging violations of his constitutional rights and seeking…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.