Andrew Nguyen v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 12, 20218:21-cv-00035California6,117 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

cDa.n Cdheratdo nA@ndliettrlteorn.c, oBmar No. 199922 Miko Sargizian, Bar No. 285976 msargizian@littler.com LITTLER MENDELSON P.C. 18565 Jamboree Road, Suite 800 Irvine, California 92612 Telephone: 949.705.3000 Fax No.: 949.724.1201 Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.

7 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

12 13 ANDREW NGUYEN, Case No. 8:21-cv-00035-CJC (DFMx) 14 Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER AND CLAWBACK v. AGREEMENT 16 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., a California Corporation; ALLEN GUDIM, Trial Date: 1/23/2023 an individual; NORMAN M. FSC Filed: 3/17/2021 BROTHERS, JR., an individual, RICHARD N. PERETZ, an individual and DOES 1 through 40, inclusive, Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS OF STIPULATION AND

PROTECTIVE ORDER

3 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 4 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure 5 and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.