Jemey Perry v. 165 Culver Blvd., LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 20, 20212:21-cv-06719California493 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. CV 21-06719-CJC-JC Date: August 20, 2021

Title: JAMEY PERRY V. 165 CULVER BLVD., LLC, ET AL.

PRESENT:

HONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Rolls Royce Paschal N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:

None Present None Present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY

THIS COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF’S UNRUH ACT CLAIM

On August 19, 2021, Plaintiff Jamey Perry filed this action against Defendants, alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”). (Dkt. 1 [Complaint, hereinafter “Compl.”].) Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief under the ADA and statutory damages under the Unruh Act. (Id.) Plaintiff contends that this Court has jurisdiction over her ADA claim based on the existence of a federal question and jurisdiction over her Unruh Act claim based on supplemental jurisdiction. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.