Arroyo Escondido, LLC v. Balmoral Farm, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
O
44 55 66 77 United States District Court 88 Central District of California 99 1100 1111 ARROYO ESCONDIDO, LLC, Case No. 2:19-cv-08464-ODW (DFMx)
1122 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY
1133 v. JUDGMENT [50] AND GRANTING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
1144 BALMORAL FARM, INC., et al., PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [49] 1155 Defendants.
1166 1177 I. INTRODUCTION 1188 Plaintiff Arroyo Escondido, LLC initiated this action against Defendants 1199 Balmoral Farm, Inc., Traci Brooks, and Carleton Brooks claiming Defendants 2200 fraudulently induced Arroyo into purchasing a pony that was unsuitable for its 2211 intended purpose—competing in high-level sporting events. (Compl., ECF No. 1.) 2222 Presently before the Court are the parties’ Motions for Partial Summary Judgment. 2233 (Pl.’s Mot. Partial Summ. J. (“PMPSJ”), ECF No. 50; Defs.’ Mot. Partial Summ. J. 2244 (“DMPSJ”), ECF No. 49.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES 2255 Arroyo’s Motion and GRANTS Defendants’ Motion.1 2266 2277