Covello
Warren Davis v. Covello
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WARREN DAVIS, Case No. 2:19-cv-07249-PA (MAA)
Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND v. RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
MARCUS POLLARD, Warden, Respondent. 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. For the following reasons, Petitioner’s objections are overruled. Petitioner objects that the Report relied solely on the victims’ accounts to set out a factual summary of the crimes, and he disputes several details of that factual summary. (Objections [ECF No. 56] at 3-8.) Petitioner’s valid plea of no contest, however, relinquishes any claim challenging the facts of the charged crimes. See Class v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 798,…