Raul B. Quiroz v. Christian Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20212:14-cv-07826California887 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAUL BECERRA QUIROZ, Case No. CV 14-7826-JAK (GJS) Petitioner

v. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF

CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE

Respondent.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the operative 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition in this case (Dkt. 27 and 27-1 through 27-4, “Petition”) and all relevant pleadings, motions, and other documents filed in this action, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 75, “Report”), and Petitioner’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 80). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of the matters to which objections have been stated. Petitioner’s assertions and arguments have been reviewed carefully. Petitioner’s Objections rest for the most part on his contention that the state habeas proceedings related to his federal habeas claims were deficient,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.