William Lawrence McGrann v. Beverly McGrann Walker
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20218:20-cv-01447California575 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. 8:20-cv-01447-JLS-DFM Date: August 30, 2021 Title: William Lawrence McGrann v. Beverly McGrann Walker et al Present: Honorable JOSEPHINE L. STATON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Melissa Kunig N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:
Not Present Not Present
PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER (1) TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF
SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION AND (2) VACATING
HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT
JUDGMENT ON SEPTEMBER 17, 2021
Plaintiff filed this action on August 5, 2020, alleging, in brief, that Defendant coerced Plaintiff’s former girlfriend to hide her pregnancy from him. (Compl., Doc 1.) Having reviewed the Complaint, it appears the Court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over this action. “Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction.” Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994). The district court has a duty to establish…