Sarah Finucane v. Hope Wine, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20212:21-cv-04795California2,108 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

JS-

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

SARAH FINUCANE, Case № 2:21-cv-04795-ODW (AGRx)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v.

REMAND [12]

HOPE WINE, LLC; ONE HOPE, INC.;

INSPERITY PEO SERVICES, LP;

15 INSPERITY, INC.; and DOES 1 through

10, Inclusive, 16 Defendants.

17 I. INTRODUCTION Defendants Hope Wine, LLC, One Hope, Inc., Insperity PEO Services, LP, and Insperity, Inc. (“Defendants”) removed this action from the Los Angeles County Superior Court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. (Notice of Removal (“NOR”) ¶ 1, ECF No. 1.) Now before the Court is Plaintiff Sarah Finucane’s Motion to Remand for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (See Mot. Remand (“Mot.”), ECF No. 12.) For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS Finucane’s Motion to Remand.1 26

1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.