Intervention911
Intervention911 v. City of Palm Springs
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
O
2 3 4 5 6
United States District Court Central District of California
INTERVENTION911, Case № 5:13-cv-01117-ODW (SPx)
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v. MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT
OF DISMISSAL [554]
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS,
15 Defendant.
16 I. INTRODUCTION Currently before the Court is Plaintiff Intervention911’s Motion to Vacate Judgment of Dismissal. (Mot. Vacate (“Mot.”), ECF No. 554.) The matter is fully briefed. (Opp’n, ECF No. 555; Reply, ECF No. 557.) For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Intervention911’s Motion.1 II. BACKGROUND On April 15, 2020, the Court dismissed this action with prejudice on two alternative bases, finding that Plaintiff Intervention911 (1) lacked standing, and (2) failed to prosecute the action. (See Order Dismissing, ECF No. 546.) The next day, the Court issued a Judgment for Defendant City of Palm Springs (“City”). (J.,
1 Having carefully considered the papers…