Hilda Markarian v. Johnson and Johnson

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20212:21-cv-05650California1,066 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JS6

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES —- GENERAL

No. 2:21-cv-05650-ODW-(SHKx) Date August 30, 2021 Title Hilda Markarian v. Johnson and Johnson et al

Present: The Honorable Otis D. Wnght, II, United States District Judge Sheila English Not reported N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not present Not present Proceedings: In Chambers

Plaintiff Hilda Markarian initiated this action on August 1, 2018, in state court. (Notice of Removal (“NOR”), Ex. A (“Compl.”), ECF No. 4-2.) On July 13, 2021, Defendant Johnson & Johnson removed this action on the basis of purported diversity jurisdiction. (NOR, ECF 4.) Plaintiff moves to remand, arguing this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this action. (Mot. to Remand, ECF No. 12.) The Court agrees and REMANDS this action to state court. Federal courts have subject matter jurisdiction only as authorized…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.