Garineh Baghdasarian v. Macys, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GARINEH BAGHDASARIAN, Plaintiff, 12 Case No. 2:21-CV-04153-AB (MAAx) v.

MACY’S, INC., MACY’S, MACY’S

DEPARTMENT STORES, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

SHANNON GIANCOTTA, AND

REMAND

DOES 1 THROUGH 100,

INCLUSIVE

18 Defendants. 19 Before the Court is Plaintiff Garineh Baghdasarian’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for 20 Remand (“Motion,” Dkt. No. 9). Defendants Macy’s, Inc., Macy’s, and Macy’s 21 Department Stores (collectively “Defendants”) filed an opposition (“Opp’n,” Dkt. No. 22 13). Plaintiff filed a reply (“Reply,” Dkt. No.18). After reading and considering the 23 arguments presented by the parties, the Court finds this matter appropriate for 24 resolution without a hearing. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. For the 25 reasons stated below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Remand, and 26 Plaintiff’s request for attorneys’ fees and costs is DENIED as moot. 27 1. 28 I. BACKGROUND a. Plaintiff’s Employment Background On November 19, 1991,…