Sydney A. Petillo v. Clark

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20212:20-cv-08408California1,915 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 SYDNEY A. PETILLO, Case No. 2:20-cv-8408-GW (MAR) Petitioner, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DISMISSING CASE

v. WARDEN CLARK, Respondent. 15 16 I. INTRODUCTION On September 8, 2020, Sydney A. Petillo (“Plaintiff”) filed a pro se Civil Rights Complaint (“Complaint”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“section 1983”). ECF Docket No. (“Dkt.”) 1. On February 12, 2021, the Court dismissed the Complaint with leave to amend, granting Plaintiff twenty-one (21) days to file a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). Dkt. 11 at 8. To date, Plaintiff has not filed a FAC. For the reasons below, the Court DISMISSES this action, without prejudice. II. BACKGROUND On September 8, 2020, Plaintiff filed the Complaint. Dkt. 1. On February 12, 2021, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the Complaint should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.