Warden
Daniel A. Martinez v. Warden
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20212:21-cv-06989California1,024 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11 DANIEL A. MARTINEZ, Case No. 2:21-cv-6989-FLA (MAR) 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME, DISMISSING
WARDEN, MATTER WITHOUT PREJUDICE,
Respondent. AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF
APPEALABILITY
18 I. INTRODUCTION Daniel A. Martinez (“Petitioner”), a California state prisoner, has constructively filed1 a letter requesting an extension of time for filing his federal habeas petition. ECF Docket No. (“Dkt.”) 1 at 1. For the reasons stated below, Petitioner’s Motion for an Extension of Time is denied, and the action is dismissed without prejudice. /// ///
27 1 Under the “mailbox rule,” when a pro se prisoner gives prison authorities a pleading to mail to II. SUMMARY OF THE PROCEEDINGS On April 15, 2020, the California Court of Appeal denied Petitioner’s state habeas petition. Dkt. 1 at 1. On August 24,…