Ezekio Madamba v. Cascade Collections, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20212:21-cv-06367California242 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California 9 10 11 EZEKIO MADAMBA. Case № 2:21-cv-06367-ODW (GJSx) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 14 CASCADE COLLECTIONS, INC. et al., DISMISS AS MOOT [18] Defendants. 16 17 /// 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 On September 3, 2021, Defendant Cascade Collections, Inc. served Plaintiff 2 || Ezekio Madamba with a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) motion to dismiss 3 || in this case. (ECF No. 18.) On September 13, 2021, less than twenty-one days later, 4|| Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 22.) Federal Rule of Civil 5 || Procedure 15(a)(1) allows plaintiffs to file an amended complaint once as a matter of 6 || course within twenty-one days of service with a Rule 12(b) motion. Therefore, 7 || Plaintiff's amended complaint was proper. As the pending motion to dismiss was 8 based on a complaint that is no longer operative, the motion is DENIED as MOOT. 9 || See Ramirez v. County of San…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.