Florence Walker v. State of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 FLORENCE WALKER, Case No. EDCV 21-419-JFW (KK) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATION OF

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL., UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE

Defendant(s). 15 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Third Amended Complaint, the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has objected. To the extent Plaintiff is attempting to allege new facts in the Objections, the Court declines to consider them. See Hebert v. Moreno, No. EDCV 15-2641-PSG (KS), 2016 WL 1733425, at *1 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2016) (noting a district court has discretion, but is not required, to consider assertions presented for the first time in objections to a report and recommendation). Moreover, the Objections are needlessly long, confusing, and often incomprehensible. It is…