Arsen Panasian v. John Sutton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

ARSEN PANASIAN, ) NO. LA CV 20-06022-VBF (AGR)

) 12 Petitioner, ) ) 13 v. ) ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS 14 JOHN SUTTON, Warden, ) AND RECOMMENDATION OF ) MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 Respondent. ) ) 16 ) ) 17 18 19 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the other records on file herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) and the Objections. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation in the Report.1 26 In his objections, Petitioner argues that the portion of Ground Six based on the trial court’s failure, sua sponte, to instruct on accident should be deemed exhausted because a different section of his petition for review before the California Supreme Court incorporated by reference an earlier section of that …