Castillo

Henry Desean Adams v. Castillo

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 20212:20-cv-01534California743 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 HENRY DESEAN ADAMS, ) NO. CV 20-1534-DOC (AGR) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND v. ) RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED ) STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CASTILLO, et al., ) ) Defendant. ) ) 15 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, records on file, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) and Plaintiff’s three subsequent filings: (1) Motion for Order Submitting Further Evidence; (2) Opposition to Report and Recommendation; and (3) Motion in Support of Opposition [to] Defendant Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Complaint (Dkt. Nos. 81-83). The Court has construed the three filings as objections to the Report. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Report. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to submit evidence is DENIED…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.