Anselmo E. Perez v. Craig Koenig

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 20212:21-cv-03912California239 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 21-3912 CAS (MRW) Date September 21, 2021 Title Perez v. Koenig

Present: Hon. Michael R. Wilner, U.S. Magistrate Judge Veronica Piper n/a Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys for Petitioner: Attorneys for Respondent: n/a n/a Proceedings: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: MOTION RESPONSE 1. In August 2021, the Attorney General moved to dismiss this habeas corpus action. (Docket # 10.) By separate order, the Court informed Petitioner of his obligation (under Local Rule 7-12 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41) to respond to the motion. Petitioner’s response was due by September 10, 2021. (Docket # 12.) To date, however, Petitioner has not filed any response to the motion. Petitioner is ordered to show cause why this action should not summarily be dismissed due to his failure. Petitioner may respond to this order to show cause by filing his opposition to the original motion plus an explanation for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.