Elizabeth Hintz v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20212:21-cv-06199California2,060 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3 4 5 Elizabeth Hintz, 2:21-cv-06199-VAP-ADSx Plaintiff,

v. Order DENYING Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (Dkt. No. 9) Costco Wholesale Corp.,

9 Defendant. 10 11 Before the Court is Plaintiff Elizabeth Hintz’s (“Plaintiff”) “Motion to Remand Case to the Superior Court of California” (“Motion”), filed on August 17, 2021. Having considered the papers filed in support of, and in opposition to, the Motion, the Court deems this matter appropriate for resolution without a hearing pursuant to Local Rule 7-15 and VACATES the hearing set on October 4, 2021 at 2:00 p.m. For the following reasons, the Court DENIES the Motion. 19 20 1 Plaintiff’s papers include several references to personally identifiable information, including Plaintiff’s birthdate, home address, and sensitive medical information, not to mention attach copies of Plaintiff’s medical records. Plaintiff failed to redact any of this information, as required by the Court’s Local…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.