Joshua Jackson v. John McMahon
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSHUA M. JACKSON, Case No. EDCV 19-0548 SB (PVC)
Plaintiff,
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,
v. CONCLUSIONS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED
JOHN McMAHON, et al., STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Defendants. 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, all the records and files herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and Plaintiff’s Objections. After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Objections were directed, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. 23 Plaintiff argues at length in his Objections that the Magistrate Judge’s earlier Report and Recommendation recommending that Defendants’ unopposed Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint be denied somehow “contradicts” the recommendation in the…