Joshua Jackson v. John McMahon

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20215:19-cv-00548California1,236 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSHUA M. JACKSON, Case No. EDCV 19-0548 SB (PVC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,

v. CONCLUSIONS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

JOHN McMAHON, et al., STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Defendants. 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, all the records and files herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and Plaintiff’s Objections. After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Objections were directed, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. 23 Plaintiff argues at length in his Objections that the Magistrate Judge’s earlier Report and Recommendation recommending that Defendants’ unopposed Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint be denied somehow “contradicts” the recommendation in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.