Christopher Goertemiller v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20212:21-cv-01583California4,481 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Joynt Law 225 S. Lake Ave., Suite 300 Pasadena, CA 91101 Telephone: (213) 277-7072 kjoynt@joyntlaw.com 4 Attorney for Defendant

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHRISTOPHER GOERTEMILLER, 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. Case No. 2:21-CV-1583 AB (AFMx)

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; TRAVIS

OGLE; JON BECK; FORREST STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

TUCKER; DIMITRI RASAEI; ORDER, 1AND [PROPOSED] MICHAEL MILLER; CHRISTOPHER ORDER

VODA,

15 Defendants. 16 17 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.