Daniel Escamilla v. City of Santa Ana

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 DANIEL ESCAMILLA, Case No. 8:19-02229 JAK (ADS)

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER ACCEPTING UNITED STATES

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND

CITY OF SANTA ANA, et al., RECOMMENDATION

Defendants.

16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint, (Dkt. No. 28), the other records on file herein, (Dkt. Nos. 33, 35, 38), the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, (Dkt. No. 40), and Plaintiff’s objections to the Report and Recommendation (“Objections”), (Dkt. No. 41). The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections were made. Plaintiff asserts multiple objections which largely reiterate the same arguments Plaintiff raised in his opposition to the underlying motion to dismiss (“Opposition”), (Dkt. No. 35), which the Report and Recommendation properly concludes have no merit. After review, the Court…