Joseph Peter Sanchez v. Attorney General of State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20212:20-cv-05226California1,347 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

JOSEPH PETER SANCHEZ, ) NO. CV 20-5226-DDP (AGR)

) 12 Petitioner, ) ) 13 v. ) ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF STATE ) AND RECOMMENDATION OF

OF CALIFORNIA, et al., ) MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 ) Respondent. ) 16 ) ) 17 18 19 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of 20 Habeas Corpus, the other records on file herein, the Report and 21 Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) and the 22 Objections. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions 23 of the Report to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the 24 findings and recommendation of the Report. 25 Petitioner does not object to the Report’s conclusions that Grounds Two 26 and Three are not cognizable on federal habeas review. (Obj. at 4; see also 27 Opp., Dkt. No. 17 at 8 (“Petitioner concedes and drops (2) double jeopardy claims 28 and (3) California’s writ processing.”) Petitioner objects to dismissal of Ground One as time…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.