Jermaine Jevon Howard v. Lucy Pearl

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20212:20-cv-05880California805 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 20-5880 MWF (MRWx) Date September 23, 2021 Title Howard v. Pearl

Present: The Honorable Michael R. Wilner Veronica Piper n/a Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant: None present None present Proceedings: ORDER RE: IFP APPLICATION AND ADEQUACY OF

AMENDED COMPLAINT

1. Plaintiff initiated a pro se lawsuit against various musical performers and entities. The majority of his claims sound in copyright infringement. Pursuant to the remand order of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, the Court will evaluate at the appropriate stage whether Plaintiff properly stated a cause of action under the “separate-accrual rule.” (Docket # 20.) 2. Before that, though, Plaintiff must demonstrate that: (a) he is eligible for IFP status as previously requested; and (b) he is entitled to pursue his cause of action for an alleged violation of 25 U.S.C. § 3116. IFP Application…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.