Antonio Quarterman v. Superior Court of California County of San Bernardino

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 20215:21-cv-01549California1,390 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 ANTONIO QUARTERMAN, Case No. 5:21-cv-1549-AB-MAR Petitioner,

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

v. DISMISSING THE ACTION SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, Respondent. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION On September 3, 2021, Petitioner, proceeding pro se, constructively filed1 20 a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Petition”) by a Person in State Custody 21 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. ECF Docket No. (“Dkt.”) 1. For the reasons set forth 22 below, the action is DISMISSED with prejudice. 23 /// 24 /// 25 ///

27 1 Under the “mailbox rule,” when a pro se inmate gives prison authorities a pleading to mail to II. BACKGROUND On June 24, 2020, Petitioner was arraigned on two (2) counts of assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury (Cal. Pen. Code § 245(a)(4)) with an enhancement for inflicting great bodily injury during…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.