Rosie M. Kato v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20212:20-cv-06025California3,744 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 ROSIE M. K., Case No. CV 20-06025-RAO 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER KILOLO KIJAKAZI,2 Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 17 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Rosie M. K. challenges the denial by the Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”) of her application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”). She contends that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) erred in her consideration of the medical record and in discounting Plaintiff’s subjective symptom testimony. For the reasons stated below, the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. 24 25 1 Partially redacted in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 2 Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Kilolo Kijakazi, the Acting Commissioner of Social Security, is hereby…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.