Robert Jordan v. Charles W. Callahan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT STEWART JORDAN, Case No. EDCV 19-1883 DDP (PVC)

Petitioner,

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,

v. CONCLUSIONS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

DAVID HOLBROOK, Warden, STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Respondent. 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss, all the records and files herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and Petitioner’s Objections. After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Objections were directed, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. 23 In his Objections, Petitioner contends that under California law, he should be considered a “serious” offender, not a “violent” offender, and therefore should be eligible for early parole consideration under Proposition 57. (Obj. at 3). However, “alleged errors in the…