Williamsburg National Insurance Company v. New York Marine and General Insurance Company
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 'O' 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CV 21-4377-RSWL-JDEx 12 WILLIAMSBURG NATIONAL
INSURANCE COMPANY,
ORDER re: Defendant’s 13 Motion to Dismiss [12] Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 16 NEW YORK MARINE AND
GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
17 Defendant. 18 19 20 Currently before the Court is Defendant New York 21 Marine and General Insurance Company’s (“Defendant”) 22 Motion to Dismiss (the “Motion”) [12]. Having reviewed 23 all papers submitted pertaining to this Motion, the 24 Court NOW FINDS AND RULES AS FOLLOWS: the Court GRANTS 25 in part and DENIES in part the Motion. 26 27 28 1 I. BACKGROUND 2 A. Factual Background
3 Plaintiff Williamsburg National Insurance Company 4 (“Plaintiff”), a Michigan-based insurance corporation, 5 issued a motor carrier liability policy to DLR Express, 6 Inc. (“DLR”) that provides a $1,000,000 combined single 7 limit for covered accidents. Compl. ¶¶ 3, 5, ECF No. 1. 8 Attached to the policy is the MCS-90 endorsement, which 9 is a standardized form…