Jarrod Gordon v. Riverside Transit Agency

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION JARROD GORDON, ) No. EDCV 20-2424-RGK (AGR) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ) ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY, et ) WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE al., ) TO PROSECUTE ) Defendants. ) ) ) 17 For the reasons discussed below, the Court orders Plaintiff to show cause, if 18 there be any, in writing on or before October 21, 2021, why this action should not be 19 dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and/or comply with a court order. 20 A. Procedural History 21 On November 18, 2020, Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a 22 complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Riverside Transit Agency (“RTA”); 23 the County of Riverside (“County”); Tom Franklin, chief operations officer of RTA; and 24 RTA employees Stephanie Sirls (sued as “Stephine Sirls”), Haley…