Russell Keith Gault v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20212:20-cv-10687California541 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUSSELL KEITH GAULT, Case No. CV 20-10687 PA (PVC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,

v. CONCLUSIONS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Defendant. 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint, all the records and files herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and Defendant’s Objections. After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Objections were directed, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. The Court is not persuaded by Defendant’s contention that the Second Amended Complaint fails to adequately allege that the officers summoned to subdue Plaintiff in the January 3, 2017 Incident were aware of his mental condition. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.