Mahoney

Remondo Bell v. Mahoney

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20212:18-cv-05280California1,747 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND.

A. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS.

Plaintiff alleges that in April and May 2015, he was treated for gunshot wounds at the USC Medical Center and prescribed Neurontin for neuropathic pain. When he was transferred to Los Angeles County Jail (“LACJ”) as a pretrial detainee, Defendants refused to continue his Neurontin medication and substituted Elavil instead. In August and September 2015, Plaintiff returned to USC Medical Center for care related to a slip- and-fall injury where physicians emphasized that Elavil is not an adequate substitute for Neurontin. When Plaintiff returned to LACJ, Defendants again refused to prescribe Neurontin, instead increasing his Elavil dosage. As a result, Plaintiff alleges that he developed Steven-Johnson Syndrome. After multiple complaints by Plaintiff to the ACLU related to his healthcare, Plaintiff alleges that Defendants retaliated by excluding him from physical therapy and the use of a walker.

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:18-cv-05280 AB (KES) Date: October 4, 2021 Page

Plaintiff contends that Defendants violated his Fourteenth Amendment rights to adequate medical care when they misprescribed Elavil and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.