B.O.P.

Kareen Anderson v. B.O.P.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20215:20-cv-02673California2,223 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 ) KAREEN ANDERSON, ) Case No. EDCV 21-2673-JLS (JEM) ) Plaintiff, ) ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER v. ) DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH ) LEAVE TO AMEND B.O.P., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) 17 On December 23, 2020, Kareen Anderson (“Plaintiff”), federal prisoner proceeding 18 pro se, filed a Complaint alleging violations of his civil rights pursuant to Bivens v. Six 19 Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1970) (“Bivens”). On July 29, 2021, the District Court 20 issued an order denying Plaintiff’s application for a temporary restraining order and 21 discharging an order to show cause it had issued regarding lack of subject matter 22 jurisdiction. Plaintiff has now submitted the necessary paperwork and the initial partial filing 23 fee, and the Court has granted him permission to proceed in forma pauperis. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.