Armida Rivera v. Vishay Americas, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 12, 20215:20-cv-01719California7,882 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 ARMIDA RIVERA, Case № 5:20-cv-01719-ODW (SPx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v.

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT

14 VISHAY AMERICAS, INC., et al., VISHAY SPRAGUE, INC.’S

Defendants. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT [27]

16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Armida Rivera brings this action pursuant to the California Fair 19 Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”) against her former employer, Defendant 20 Vishay Sprague, Inc. for discrimination, retaliation, and related FEHA claims. (First 21 Am. Compl. (“FAC”), ECF No. 13.) Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment or 23 Adjudication. (Mot. Summ. J. (“Mot.”), ECF No. 27.) For the following reasons, the 24 Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendant’s Motion.1 25 26

28 1 After considering the papers filed in connection with this Motion, the Court deemed this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. Cal. L.R.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.