Global Apogee v. Sugarfina, inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20212:18-cv-05162California3,826 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

'O' 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CV 18-5162-RSWL-E x GLOBAL APOGEE, ORDER re: Individual Plaintiff, Defendants’ Motion to v. Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion to SUGARFINA, INC., et. al., Strike Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint [60] Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff Global Apogee (“Plaintiff”) filed this Action [1] on June 11, 2018 against Defendants Sugarfina, Inc. (“Sugarfina”), Joshua Resnick, and Rosie O’Neill alleging trademark infringement among other related claims. The Action arises out of Defendants’ purported unauthorized use of Plaintiff’s federally registered CANDY-GRAM service mark. Before this Court is a Motion to Strike, or in the alternative, Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second 28 Amended Complaint [60] filed by Defendants Joshua

Resnick and Rosie O’Neill (“Individual Defendants”).

For the following reasons, this Court DENIES as moot Individual Defendants’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.