Tomas Sarinana, Jr. v. Alex Villanueva

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 14, 20212:21-cv-07900California1,931 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TOMAS SARINANA, JR., Case No. CV 21-7900-JLS (JEM) Petitioner, ORDER SUMMARILY DISMISSING v.

PETITION AND DENYING CERTIFICATE

OF APPEALABILITY

JIM MCDONNELL,

15 Respondent.

On October 1, 2021, Tomas Sarinana, Jr. (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner 19 proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 20 2241, which is properly construed as a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 21 U.S.C. § 2254 (“Petition” or “Pet.”). 22 /// /// 25 /// 26 /// 27

PRIOR FEDERAL HABEAS PROCEEDINGS

1 Petitioner has filed at least two other federal habeas petitions pertaining to the 2 same underlying state criminal proceedings at issue in this case. See Tomas 3 Sarinana, Jr. v. Alex Villanueva, CV 20-9629-JLS (JEM) (“Sarinana I”), and Tomas Sarinana, Jr. v. Alex Villanueva, CV 21-3780-JLS (JEM) (“Sarinana II”). The Court 6 determined that it was appropriate to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.